Mohd. Shamim ( 1 ) THIS is an application by the petitioner for release on bail. ( 2 ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is absolutely no evidence against the petitioner Nothing was recovered from the petitioner. The petitioner has been in custody for the last near about two years. The petitioner is thus entitled to an order of bail. ( 3 ) LEARNED PP, Mr. Dass, has urged to the contrary. According to the learned PP, 5 Kg. of heroine was recovered from the co-accused Shri Ala-ud-din on August 20, 1993. Subsequently, 16. 515 Kg. of heroine was recovered on August 21,1993 from the co-accused named above, alongwith 2 Kg. of opium. The learned PP has in this connection led me through the statement of the petitioner. He has stated therein that 5 Kg. of smack was recovered from him in the year 1984. He is facing trial in connection therewith at Tis Hazari Courts. ( 4 ) THEN, there is the statement of the co-accused Ala-ud-din. He has stated in his statement that one Akhlaque used to supply smack to Shri Rafiq from time to time. He further goes onto state that the petitioner is one of his partner. It has further been stated by him that he knew Rafiq who had kept smack in a white trunk in the house of a blind person. ( 5 ) THEN, there is the statement of Mst. Hamida who has stated that the petitioner alongwith one Akhlaque came to her house to pick away the bag which was lying alongwith the box at her house. ( 6 ) CONSIDERING the above facts and circumstances and keeping in view the provisions of Sections 29 and 37 of the N. D. and P. S. Act, I do not think present case is a fit case for bail. I do not see any force in the present petition. Dismissed.