Research › Browse › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

1995 DIGILAW 365 (RAJ)

Onkar v. State of Rajasthan

1995-04-10

N.L.TIBREWAL

body1995
JUDGMENT 1. - It has been contended that a cross case of the same incident has been filed from the side of the accused. According to the learned counsel, three persons namely. Rang Lal, Ram Raj and Smt. Razo have sustained a number of injuries from the side of the accused. It was also contended that the injuries sustained by Ram Sahay were found to be simple in nature on x-ray examination. Learned counsel has also contended that the `bada' where the incident took place was in possession of the accused persons and a case under Section 447, Indian Penal Code has been registered against the members of the complainant party.Without, expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, but taking into consideration the facts of the case, I am inclined to grant this bail application under Section 438, Criminal Procedure Code and released the petitioners on bail.It is, therefore, ordered that petitioners (1) Onkar son of Kishan; (2) Mohan son of Kalyan; (3) Ranglal son of Mohanlal and (4) Ramraj son of Mohan Lal, all residents Raghavarpura, tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur, in the event of their arrest in FIR No. 56/95, registered at the Police Station, Chaksu, District Jaipur be released on bail provided each one of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 5000/- with two sureties of Rs. 2500/- each to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer/arresting officer, on the following terms and conditions:- 1. That the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by police officer as and when required; 2. That the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any persons acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to that court or to any police officer; 3. That the petitioners shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. Bail granted. *******