Research › Browse › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

1995 DIGILAW 500 (RAJ)

Baluram v. State of Rajasthan

1995-05-22

RAJENDRA SAXENA

body1995
JUDGMENT 1. - Heard. Perused the challan papers as also the FIR, the police statements of Shrikishan Narayan Lal and other injured persons, the injury report of Shrikishan and his post-mortem examination report and as also injury reports of other persons. 2. Shrikishan and Narayan Lal deceased had multiple stab wounds and it is alleged that the petitioners had caught hold of Shrikishan while co-accused Suvta aged 35 years inflicted multiple stab wounds on the vital parts of his body resulting in his death. 3. The contention of Shri Khatri is that in the FIR no overt act of Baluram and Ramchandra regarding catching hold of Shrikishan has been mentioned and that later on these witnesses have stated that the petitioners have caught hold of Shrikishan while co-accused Suvta had inflicted knife blows to him. His another contention is that Baluram and Ramchandra are aged 72 and 66 years respectively as per their arrest memos and that lady co-accused persons have already been released on bail. 4. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioners Baluram and Ramchandra are aged 72 and 66 years as mentioned in their respective arrest memos and the fact that the lady accused have also been bailed out, I feel inclined to allow this bail petition only on the ground of their old age. 5. Accordingly this bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that petitioners (1) Baluram & (2) Ramchandra be released on bail provided each one of them executes his personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. twenty thousand) and furnishes two sound and substantial sureties for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- each of the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Sojat Camp Jaitaran for his regular appearance before him in the Sessions Case arising out of Crime No. 28/95, P.S., Anandpur Kalu, Distt. Pali on each and every date of hearing and whenever ordered to do so.Bail allowed. *******