JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor for the State and also perused the documents on record. It has been submitted that recovery of juti of deceased was made at the instance of co-accused Lala Ram. The trial Court has wrongly mentioned in the order that recovery of the juti of deceased was at the instance of petitioner. It is a case of circumstantial evidence and no motive has been shown of accused- petitioner behind the offence 2. Learned PP has not controverted these facts. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by both the sides, I am inclined to grant bail Under section 439 Cr.PC to the accused-petitioner. 4. It is, therefore, ordered that the accused petitioner Sarwan S/o Chhitar in FIR No. 94/95 shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand) with two sureties in the amount of Rs. 15,000/- each, to the satisfaction the trial Court with the stipulation to appear in that Court as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of trial against him in this case. *******