Research › Browse › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

1995 DIGILAW 674 (RAJ)

Jaikishan v. State of Rajasthan

1995-07-28

Y.R.MEENA

body1995
JUDGMENT 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor for the State and also perused the documents on record. The petitioner Jaikishan is elder brother of husband of deceased and Badlu Ram, petitioner is 70 years of age and uncle-in-law of deceased. They have nothing to do with the dowry. They are in custody for the last one month. No further investigation is required.In the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by both the sides, I am inclined to grant bail under Section 439 Criminal Procedure Code to the accused - petitioners.It is therefore, ordered that the accused petitioners (1) Jaikishan and (2) Badlu Ram shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand) with two sureties in the amount of Rs. 15,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation to appear in that court as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the trial against them in this case.No case is made out for bail in age of Smt. Sharbati W/o Hardwari and Smt. Ratti D/o Hardwari, therefore, their bail application is dismissed. Hence, it will be open for them to move fresh bail application after the challan is filed.Bail Application allowed. *******