Research › Browse › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
1996 DIGILAW 1160 (RAJ)
Nanagram v. Sagar Mal
1996-10-09
SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
body1996
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr kekZ-&;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk flfoy U;k;k/khk ¼o-[k-½ uhedkFkkuk ftyk lhdj ds vknsk fnukad 22-8-1995 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gS ftlds }kjk fMØhnkj@izfri{kh Øe 1 yxk;r 4 dk izkFkZuki= vUrxZr /kkjk 151] O;ogkj izfØ;k lafgrk Lohdkj fd;k x;k gSA ¼2½- laf{kIr esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd oknh dsnkj ey us vxzØ;kf/kdkj ds lEcU/k esa ,d okn v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;k tks fnukad 6-4-1983 dks fMØh gks x;kA oknh dsnkjey us mDr fMØh ds vuqlj.k esa btjk; ;kfpdk U;k;ky; flfoy U;k;k/khk lhdj ds ;gka izLrqr dh] mDr btjk; fnukad 15-7-1992 dks fMØhnkj o mlds vf/koDrk dh vuqifLFkfr esa fujLr dj nh xbZ ftls jsLVksj djkus ds fy, fMØhnkj us izkFkZuk i= fnukad 21-8-1995 dks izLrqr fd;k ftlesa dfFkr fd;k fd mUgsa btjk; lhdj ls uhedkFkkuk LFkkukUrfjr gksdj vkus dk uksfVl ugha feyk vkSj muds vf/koDrk us mUgsa ,slh dksbZ lwpuk ugha nhA fu"iknu U;k;ky; us fnukad 22-8-1995 dks izkFkhZx.k dks lwpuk fn, fcuk gh btjk; dks uEcj ij fy;s tkus ¼jsLVksj fd, tkus½ ds vknsk ns fn;sA mDr vknsk ls O;fFkr gksdj ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA ¼3½- izkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh equh eujatu dk dFku gS fd btjk; dh dk;Zokgh le;kof/k ls ckf/kr Fkh vkSj izkFkhZx.k dks lquokbZ dk volj fn, fcuk btjk; dh dk;Zokgh dks uEcj ij ugha fy;k tk ldrk FkkA ¼4½- blds foijhr izfri{khx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh ch-,y- eU/kkuk dk rdZ gS fd btjk; dh dk;Zokgh lhdj ls uhedkFkkuk U;k;ky; esa nksuksa i{kksa dh mifLFkfr esa LFkkukUrfjr dh xbZ Fkh vkSj i{kdkjx.k fnukad 19-5-1992 dks LFkkukUrfjr U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gq, Fks vkSj i{kdkjksa dh vuqifLFkfr esa btjk; dk izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k x;k gS vkSj bl izdkj ds izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus ds fy, dksbZ le;kof/k fu/kkZfjr ugha dh xbZ gSA vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa Jh eU/kkuk us U;k;ky; dk /;ku Jhjkuh y{eh th-,l-MCyw- feYl izk-fy- cuke VsDlVkbZy dehku ¼1½ o vtqZu flag cuke eksfgUnz dqekj ¼2½ esa izfrikfnr fd, x, fl)kUrksa dh vksj vkdf"kZr fd;kA Jh eU/kkuk dk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd jsLiksjsku dk izkFkZuk i= fnukad 21-8-1995 dks /kkjk 151] O;ogkj izfØ;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj mlds lkFk /kkjk 5] ifjlhek vf/kfu;e dk izkFkZuk i= Hkh izLrqr fd;k x;k FkkA mDr izkFkZuk i=ksa dk fu.khZr _.kh dks dksbZ uksfVl fn;k tkuk vko;d ugha Fkk D;ksafd ftl frfFk dks btjk;t dh dk;Zokgh fujLr dh xbZ Fkh ml frfFk dks fu.khZr _.kh ;k mldk vf/koDrk Hkh U;k;ky; esa miLFkfr ugha FkkA bl rdZ ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus U;k;ky; dk /;ku jkefdkksj cuke /kuckn uxj ikfydk ¼3½ o fkkqiky cuke ekud pUn ¼4½] esa ikfjr fu.kZ;ksa dh vksj vkdf"kZr fd;kA ¼5½- fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh eU/kkuk us ;g Hkh rdZ fn;k fd fu.khZr _.kh us 9-11-1995 dks mifLFkr gksdj btjk; ds xq.knks"k ds lEcU/k esa vkifRr;ka izLrqr dh Fkh vkSj mDr vkifRr;ksa esa btjk; dks uEcj ij fy, tkus ds lEcU/k esa dksbZ vkifRr izLrqr ugha dh Fkh mlds mijkUr fnukad 27-11-1995 dks fu.khZr _.kh us btjk; dks uEcj ij fy;s tkus ds lEcU/k esa vkifRr izLrqr dh FkhA pwafd fu.khZr _.kh dks dkuwuu uksfVl fn;k tkuk vko;d ugha Fkk blfy, vf/kuLFk U;k;ky; us tks vknsk ikfjr fd;k gS og dkuwu mfpr gS ftlesa {ks=kf/kdkj lEcfU/kr dksbZ =qfV vUrxZLr ugha gS vkSj bl izdkj ds izdj.kksa esa vknsk 21 fu;e 105 o 106] O;ogkj izfØ;k lafgrk ds izko/kku ykxw ugha gksarsA bl lEcU/k esa mUgksaus U;k;ky; dk /;ku y{eh th-,l-MCYkw- feYl izk-fy- cuke VsDlVkbZy dehuj ¼mijksDr m)r½ o Bkdqj ckbZ cuke y{ehpUn ¼5½ esa ikfjr fu.kZ;ksa dh vksj vkdf"kZr fd;kA ¼6½- fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh eU/kkuk us vius i{k ds leFkZu esa ;g Hkh rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd tc btjk; dh dk;Zokgh /kkjk 151 O;ogkj izfØ;k lafgrk vUrxZr gh uEcj ij yh tk ldrh gS D;ksafd u rks mDr vknsk dh vihy gks ldrh gS vkSj uk gh iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh tk ldrh gSA bl rdZ ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus U;k;ky; dk /;ku dsljnso cuke jk/kkfdku ¼6½] dh vksj vkdf"kZr fd;kA ¼7½- eSaus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k ds rdksZa dks /;ku iwoZd lqukA vk{ksfir vknsk dk voyksdu fd;kA ¼8½- bl U;k;ky; dh [k.MihB us fkkqiky cuke ek.kdpUn ¼mijksDr m)r½ ds izdj.k esa fuEu vo/kkj.kk O;Dr dh gS& "We are therefore, of the opinion that when the suit has been dismissed in default of the plaintiff, without notice of the application of both the parties and it has been restored back on the application of the plaintiff, without notice of the application to the defendant, a notice is necessary to the defendant after restoration for proceeding with the hearing of suit, although, there may be an exparte order passed against the defendant before dismissal of the suit in default of the parties.
The question does not make any reference to the situation that there was an exparte order against the defendant. Even if there is no (sic an) exparte order against the defendant, the answer to the question would be that for proceeding in the suit after restoration notice to the defendant is necessary." ¼9½- eSa bl fufpr er dk gwa fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us tks vk{ksfir vknsk ikfjr fd;k gS] mls ikfjr djus esa ,slh dksbZ dkuwuh =qfV ugha dh gS tks fd mlds {ks=kf/kdkj ls ijs gksaA ftl frfFk dks btjk; dh dk;Zokgh vne gktjh esa [kkfjt dh xbZ Fkh ml frfFk dks nksuksa i{k vuqifLFkr Fks vkSj ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds fy, ;g vko;d ugha Fkk fd btjk; dh dk;Zokgh dks uEcj ij ysus ls iwoZ izkFkhZ dks uksfVl nsrkA ¼10½- ifj.kker% ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk fujLr dh tkrh gS vkSj i{kdkjksa dks funsZk fn;k tkrk gS fd os v/khuLFk fu"iknu U;k;ky; ds le{k fnukad 1-11-1996 dks mifLFkr gksA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k vfoyEc ykSVk;k tkosA ¼11½- izdj.k ds rF;ksa dks ns[krs gq, i{kdkj viuk viuk O;; Lo;a ogu djsaxsA[ 1996 DIGILAW 1160 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]