JUDGMENT : 1. On 20.2.1996, we directed a rule to be issued to the applicant asking him to show cause why he should not be punished for committing criminal contempt of the court for use of objectionable language in the SLP and the applications. He was given eight weeks time to file his reply to the rule. Instead of filing a reply to the rule, through these two applications, the applicant seeks recall/ review of the order dated 20.2.1996 passed in SLP (Crl) No. 4114/95, Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 6242-6243/95 and SLP (Crl) 819-820 of 1996 which were dismissed by this court and of the rule issued to him. We do not find any reason to recall or review that order. There is no merit in these applications which also bristle with scandalous remarks and are couched in objectionable language. The criminal miscellaneous petitions filed by the applicant on 24.2.1996 are, therefore, dismissed. 2. In our order dated 20.2.1996, we had directed the issuance of rule and to number the contempt proceedings against the applicant separately. Those have since been numbered as criminal contempt petition No. 2 of 1996. 3. The prayer of the applicant to transfer the case to 'another bench as he does not "wish to appear before this Bench apart from being itself contumacious is rejected because a litigant cannot be permitted forum shopping. The case stands assigned to this Bench. 4. Since the applicant has not filed his reply to the notice to show cause why he should not be punished for committing criminal contempt of court, we, as a matter of indulgence, grant him another opportunity to file the reply, if any, within six weeks. List the matter for farther proceedings and hearing on 27.9.1996. The alleged contemnor Ajay Kumar Pandey, who is present in court, has been informed of the date of hearing is directed to remain present on the next date of hearing i.e. on 27.9.1996, whether or not he files his reply to the show cause notice. No fresh notice shall be issued to him for his appearance. 5. Since, Shri Dipankar Gupta has resigned, the Solicitor General of India is requested to assist the court in the contempt proceedings either himself or by nominating any other law officer.