Judgment S.N.Mishra, J. 1. With consent of the parties, both these appeals are being heard together and are being disposed of by this common order, since the point involved in both the appeals is common. 2. The plaintiff Shankar Kumar Gupta is the appellant in both the Miscellaneous appeals. Miscellaneous Appeal no, 197 of 1993 arises out of an order dated 26.2.1992, in Claim Application No. 3/8/75 and Miscellaneous Appeal No. 198 of 1993 arises out of an order dated 11.9.1992 in R.C.T. No. 3/8/74, both passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Patna Bench. 3. The only grievance of the appellant in these appeals is that the Railway Claims Tribunal has interpreted the relevant Rule, namely, Rule 141 (1)(a)(xvi) of General Rules, under Part I of Goods Tariff No. 39, issued under Sec. 77-B (4) of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 . 4. Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the aforementioned Rule has been interpreted in favour of the appellant in other claim case filed by him, namely, Claim Application No. 3/8/71 (Suit No. 7 of 1989), disposed of an 18.6.1992, whereas in the orders under challenge the Tribunal has interpreted differently and thereby non-suited the appellant with respect to the claim in question. 5. On perusal of the orders under appeal, the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellant seems to be correct. 6. In the aforementioned Claim Application No. 3/8/71 (Suit No. 7 of 1989) the claim of the claimant has been allowed on the basis of the aforesaid quoted Rule, whereas in the instant appeals the plaintiff-appellant has been non-suited interpreting differently the said Rule. In that view of the matter, it is desirable that these matters should go back to the Tribunal for passing a fresh order in the light of the order passed in the aforesaid Suit No. 7 of 1989. 7. Accordingly, the impugned orders dated 26.2.1992 and 11.9.1992 passed by the Tribunal are hereby set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Tribunal for passing a fresh order. 8. Since, the claim of the plaintiff-appellant is old one, I direct the Tribunal to pass fresh orders as early as possible, preferably within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. These miscellaneous appeals are, accordingly, allowed to the extent as indicated above, but without cost.