Judgment Prasun Kumar Deb, J. 1. Both these revision petitions are taken up together for analogous order as both these revision petitions have been filed by the contesting parties against the judgment and order in Criminal Appeal No. 179-C of 1988, wherein conviction was held under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code against the husband and his inmates on a complaint being filed by the wife. 2. The revision petitions are preferred one for enhancement of punishment and the other for setting aside the punishment order and affimation order thereto. 3. It appears that good sense has been prevailed amongst the spouses and when it became impossible for them to lead conjugal life any further and when the matrimonial home has been broken for all practical purposes, they have decided to withdraw all allegations and counter-allegations against each other and get themsalves separated on divorce by mutual consent. 4. In that view of the matter, in the matrimonial suit filed by the husband, a petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act has been filed before the court below for getting divorce by mutual consent in Mitrimonial Suit No. 32 of 1988, pending before the District Judge, Jamshedpur. 5. Although, Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code is non-compoundable, but in the nature and circumstances of the case and the situation prevailing, accord is hereby granted to compromise the dispute between the parties and hence joint petition filed in both the cases are hereby allowed. The conviction rocorded in JC/i Case No. 60 of 1985 and the affirmation thereof in Criminal Appeal No. 179-C of 1988 are hereby set aside on a compromise being arrived at between the spouses. 6. The revision petitions have thus become infructuous and thus disposed of accordingly.