National Aluminium Company LTD. v. Raj Kishore Alias Sahu Jena
1996-01-09
G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
body1996
DigiLaw.ai
ORDER Leave granted. 2. Though notice was served on the respondents, no one has appeared for the first respondent-claimant. The controversy is no longer res interga. They are covered by the judgment of this Court in U.P. Avas Vikas Evam Parishad v. Gyan Devi [Dead] by Lrs. & Ors.1. In that view, the appellant being beneficiary is entitled to be impleaded as a party in the pending proceedings in the court of Subordinate Judge, Angul. 3. The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs. Appeal allowed ******* Parallel Citations of other Journals : M/s. National Aluminium Co. Ltd. v. Raj Kishore, 1996(1) Supreme 737 : JT 1996(1) SC 617 00021