Judgment :- K. A. THANIKKACHALAM J. At the instance of the Department, the Tribunal referred the following two questions for the opinion of this court for the assessment years 1978-79 and 1979-80 under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is correct in law in holding that the assessee is entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act in respect of the service charges paid to the State Trading Corporation and premium paid to the Export Credit Guarantee Corporation for the assessment years 1978-79 and 1979-80 ?" There are two points that arise for consideration in these tax cases : (1) Whether the assessee is entitled to deduction under section 55B with regard to service charges paid to the State Trading Corporation and (2) Whether the assessee is entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B with regard to the premium paid to Export Credit Guarantee Corporation ? In so far as the first point is concerned, learned standing counsel represented that the question relating to the said point is not pressed In so far as the second point is concerned, various High Courts held that the assessee is entitled to weighted deduction under section 35B in respect of the premium paid to the Export Credit Guarantee Corporation in CIT v. Navabharat Enterprises (P.) Ltd. (No. 1) 1988 (170) ITR 526 (AP) the Karnataka in the case of CIT v. J. B. Advani and Co. (Mysore) (Private) Ltd. 1987 (163) ITR 638, 1987 (60) CTR 127, 1986 (26) TAXMAN 771 the Calcutta High Court in CIT v. Tungabhadra Industries Ltd. 1992 (196) ITR 912 , 1992 (108) CTR 233 (Delhi) in the case of CIT v. Indian Aluminium Cables Ltd. (No. 2) 1990 (184) ITR 587, 1989 (77) CTR 87, 1989 (46) TAXMAN 89 (Delhi) in the case of CIT v. Alleppey Co. Ltd. 1994 (207) ITR 598, 1994 (116) CTR 15, 1994 (2) TLR 214, 1994 (116) CTR(Ker) 15 (Ker). Accordingly, we return the question unanswered in so far as the first point is concerned. In so far as the second point is concerned, we answer the question referred to us in the affirmative and against the Department.