Honble JAIN, J. – The case was taken up for hearing after second round but nobody appeared on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 7. (2). In this case, an application was filed on behalf of applicants Smt. Ashri and Sahabudeen on 6.11.1995 purporting to be u/O. XXII Rr. 3 & 4 r/w O.I, R. 10 CPC claiming that the applicants are the real legal representatives of deceased Sahid. (3). From the impugned Award dated 3.11.1994, it appears that respondents No. 1 to 4 claimed themselves to be the legal representatives of deceased Sahid. Thus, there is a conflict and dispute whether respondents No. 1 to 4 or the appli- cants Smt. Ashri and Sahabudeen are the legal representatives of deceased Sahid? This question involves, determination of material facts. This cannot be done at this stage. Therefore, it will be proper to remand the case to the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Udaipur for its determination. (4). I, therefore allow this appeal, set aside the impugned Award dated 3.1.1994 passed by the learned Tribunal and remand the matter to the learned Tribunal to decide as to who are the legal representatives of deceased Sahid. The learned Tribunal will decide the matters after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties to lead the evidence, as early as possible. The parties are directed to appear before the learned Tribunal on 16.9.1996.