JUDGMENT 1. - These two revision petitions are directed against the order dated 7.11.1993 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratangarh whereby the learned Addl. Sessions Judge has acquitted the accused non-petitioners Laxmi Narain and Mst. Indra of the charge u /s. 406 IPC. 2. I have heard M/s. G.L. Khatri and A.K. Khatri for the petitioner : Mr. R.L. Jangid for the non-petitioners and Mr. S.K. Vyas, Public Prosecutor for the State. I have carefully gone through the record of the case. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has drawn my attention to the evidence recorded in the case and has submitted that the learned Addl. Sessions Judge has committed a grave error in reversing the order of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sujangarh. There was formidable evidence against the accused non-petitioners showing that they were guilty of the offence u /s.406 IPC. 4. I have perused the impugned order. The order of acquittal cannot be altered merely on the ground that the High Court may take a different view of the evidence. There must be substantial and compelling reasons for holding that the view of the court below was either wrong or perverse. The finding of acquittal based on proper appreciation of evidence cannot be reversed. In the instant case, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge has not committed any error in reversing the finding of the learned Magistrate in acquitting the accused-respondents. 5. There is no scope for interference in these revision petitions. They are therefore, dismissed.Revision dismissed. *******