JUDGMENT 1. - None present for and on behalf of the petitioner though case was taken up in the third round. 2. Perused the petition. 3. It appears that non-petitioner No. 2 Smt. Gattu filed an application under section 141 Cr.P.C. in the Court of learned Civil and Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapasan, for grant of maintenance to her as well as her son Shri Shankar Lal. The petitioner contested that application, he, denied that any marriage between him and non-petitioner No. 2 had ever been solemnised and pleaded that marriage was a nullity because he was a minor at the time of the alleged marriage. Several other objections were also raised. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kapasan after recording the evidence of both the parties and hearing the arguments, allowed the application of non-petitioner No. 2 (Smt. Gattu) by his order dated 8.4.1996 and maintenance allowance was awarded to her, no separate allowance was awarded to her son Shankar Lal. 4. The petitioner-Bhawani Shankar tiled a revision petition No. 44/1996. The non-petitioner No. 2 Smt. Gattu also filed a revision petition No. 56/1996. Both the revision petitions were heard together by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge No. 2 Chittorgarh dismissed both the revision petitions by his order dated 21.7.1997. 5. I have carefully gone through the order passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge No. 2 Chittorgarh. The order does not suffer from any such illegality, irregularity or impropriety as may require the exercise of powers under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This petition is barred by sub-section 3 of Section 397 Cr.P.C. because this petition is in fact another petition for exercising the powers of revision under section 397 Cr.P.C.For the reasons mentioned above, this petition has no force and is accordingly dismissed at the admission stage.Petition dismissed. *******