Research › Browse › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

1997 DIGILAW 342 (BOM)

Murari Balwant Metkar v. State of Maharashtra

1997-07-19

VISHNU SAHAI

body1997
JUDGMENT - VISHNU SAHAI, J.:---By means of this revision, the applicant impugns the judgment and order dated 7th July, 1992, passed by the II Addl. Sessions Judge, Nashik, in Criminal Appeal No. 38 of 1988, whereby the judgment and order dated 4-4-88, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pimpalgaon-Baswant, Dist. Nasik, convicting and sentencing him to undergo 3 months R.I. and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default to suffer R.I. for two months, for the offence under section 468 I.P.C. has been confirmed. 2.I have perused the impugned judgments and I find that there is good evidence on the basis on which the applicant has been convicted for the offence under section 468 I.P.C. That evidence has been comprehensively set out in the impugned judgments and therefore, I am not making any reference to it. It is well settled that in its revisional jurisdiction, this Court does not act as a third Court of fact. It interferes with the finding of fact only if they are perverse and this cannot be said to be so in the instant case. In my view, the conviction of the applicant for the offence under section 468 I.P.C. merits to be sustained. 3.Since the incident is alleged to have been taken place a few days less than 15 years ago and there is nothing to indicate that the applicant is a previous convict, I think, the instant case does not call for a jail sentence. 4.In the result, the revision is partly allowed and partly dismissed. Although I uphold the conviction of the applicant for the offence under section 468 I.P.C. but I reduce his jail sentence of 3 months R.I. to the period already undergone by him. I, however, maintain the sentence of fine and that on its default imposed on the applicant in case the applicant has not paid the fine of Rs. 1000/-, he may do so within 3 months from today in the trial Court, failing which, he would suffer the sentence in default of payment of fine.. 5.Rule is disposed off in the aforesaid manner. The fine shall also be accepted on production of a certified copy of my judgment which, in case, an application is made, shall be issued on an expedited basis. Revision partly allowed.