JUDGMENT 1. - Heard. Perused the petition as also the reply filed on behalf of non-petitioners No. 1 and 3. 2. At the very outset, we may state that this petition is misconceived because the petitioner itself has admitted that the alleged detenu Mohant Shri Vishnu Das was arrested under Sections 107/116 read with Section 151, Criminal Procedure Code and that he was produced before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Fatehpur Shekhawati (non-petitioner No. 2) who ordered for his release subject to his executing personal bond and furnishing the security: Therefore, from the averments made in the petition even prima facie it cannot be conceived that the alleged detenu was put under detention illegally. Besides this, as per the reply filed by the non-petitioners No. 1 and 3 since Mahant Shri Vishnu Das did not execute his personal bond and failed to furnish the security bonds, he was sent to judicial custody by the SDM and ultimately he was released by the said Magistrate on 10.2.1997 on furnishing his personal bond. No counter has been filed by the petitioner regarding the factum of release of Mahant Shri Vishnu Das. Since Shri Vishnu Das had already been released from confinement under Sections 107/116, Criminal Procedure Code, in our considered opinion, this Habeas Corpus Petition does not survive. 3. If Mahant Shri Vishnu Das was illegally and wrongfully roped in by the Police under Sections 107/116, Criminal Procedure Code and the learned SDM had arbitrarily passed illegal and arbitrary order for his detention remedy lay by filing the revision petition before the concerned Sessions Judge. This Court does not permit short circuit measures to press into service the extraordinary powers of this Court under the writ jurisdiction. Shri Vishnu Das Mahant may however seek remedy available to him before the appropriate Forum in accordance with law. 4. With these observations, this Habeas Corpus Petition is hereby dismissed.Habeas Corpus Petition dismissed. *******