JUDGMENT 1. - Neither of the parties appeared even after fourth round. 2. The case is pending since 1988. I am, therefore, deciding it on merits. 3. The petitioner has filed this petition u / sections 397, 401 r/ w Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order of learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Bali dated 28.7.1988 in case No. 10/88 by which the learned Magistrate ordered for attachment of the property in dispute under sub-sec. (1) of Section 146 Cr.P.C. 4. From the perusal of the impugned order, it appears that there is a hard dispute between the parties with regard to the house in question. The learned Magistrate after going through the documents produced along with complaint, held that there was a ground to suppose that a dispute existed between the parties with regard to the above immovable property which threaten breach of peace. He, therefore, passed an order under sub-sec. (1) of Section 145 Cr.P.C. He further failed to persuade to pass an order under sub-sec. (1) of Section 146 Cr.P.C. because there was an imminent danger of breach of peace. The learned Magistrate arrived at this conclusion on the basis of perusal of the documents produced in the case. 5. I do not find any error committed by the learned Magistrate. For the above reasons, I do not find any force in the petition and the same is hereby dismissed.Revision dismissed. *******