JUDGMENT Appeal is directed against the order dated 10.3.97 of the 3rd Addl. District Judge, Ratlam passed in M.J.C. 26/96 whereby the decretal amount has been directed to be paid in instalments of Rs. 10,000/- per year. Hence, this appeal by the decree-holder. Contention of learned counsel for decree-holder is that the instalments have been granted without the consent of the decree-holder and, therefore, the order is wholly without jurisdiction. As against it learned counsel for respondent has submitted that the Court granting a decree has inherent powers to direct payment by instalments. Order 20 Rule 11 CPC deals with decree with a direction for payment by instalments. Order 20 Rule 11 (1) CPC deals with grant of instalments prior to passing of decree i.e. during the pendency of the suit before the Court; while order 20 Rule 11(2) deals with the order of payment by instalments after the decree which reads as follows : "After the passing of any such decree the Court may, on the application of the judgment-debtor and with the consent of the decree-holder, order that payment of the amount decreed shall be postponed or shall be made by instalments on such terms as to the payment of interest, the attachment of the property of the judgment-debtor, or the taking of security from him, or otherwise, as it thinks fit." A plain reading of sub-section (2) of order 20 Rule 11, CPC would show that once a decree has been granted by Court the subsequent order of instalment after passing of the decree can be made only with the consent of the decree-holder and not otherwise. Though it is true that Court has got discretion to direct payment by instalment while passing decree but that is prior to the passing of the decree. Once the decree is passed, finalised and signed the Order 20 Rule 11 (2) CPC would come into play and, thereafter no instalment can be granted without the consent of the decree holder. Thus, the order of executing judge is erroneous and it has started that erroneous assumption. The same deserves to be set aside. As a result appeal succeeds. Impugned order of executing Court is set-aside. Now the Executing Court shall proceed with the execution as per provisions of law.