ORDER 1. This civil revision under section 14(8) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1982, by the defendant is directed against order of eviction on the ground of personal necessity. 2. Prabhawati Devi, the sole plaintiff, died during the pendency of the suit. It was submitted that after her death, the heirs who got themselves substituted in her place, should have got the plaint amended to the effect that the suit premises is required by them as well. According to the counsel, in the absence of any amendment, on the death of the sole plaintiff, the cause of action must be deemed to have come to an end. The court below, therefore, committed error in directing eviction of the defendant/petitioner. 3. In the facts of the case, I am not impressed by the arguments. The original plaintiff's need of the premises was not only for herself, it was also for the benefit of her children. It appears that after she died, her husband and children were substituted in her place and they prosecuted the suit. Some of them also examined themselves as witnesses. Their evidence has to be understood as clear desire to do grocery business in the shop premises, the need stated in the plaint. So it would not be correct to say that the need of the premises came to an end on the death the sole plaintiff. 4. The impugned order does not suffer from any error of law. The civil revision is dismissed.