ORDER Leave granted. 2. The appellant claims for promotion as Engineer-in-Chief on the basis of a Sheduled Tribe Status. In the judgment in Major Yogendra Narain Yadav v. State of Bihar & Ors., the right of the person has been determined. In this case, the question arises is : whether the appellant really belongs to Scheduled Tribe ? With a view to find the genuineness of the status as Scheduled Tribes, we had directed the petitioner to file geneology table of his family history. It is now admitted in his affidavit that the family of the appellant hails from Bilaspur, Madhya Pradesh. He claims that his forefathers had migrated to Bihar and that the appellant had done his education there and had obtained the certificate also from the District Magistrate, Patna. Admittedly, none of his forefathers had been granted any such certificate. The family history, as stated in the affidavit indicates as under : "GENEOLOGY Late Chilbili Sah l Late Chintaman Sah l Late Hira Sah l l l l Late Tulsi Sah Late Janki Sah Late Mahabir Sah l l l Ram Avatar Kaushalya (Widow) Laxmi Narayan  (Son)      (Daughter) (Son) l l l Married with Married with late Married to Bagaha Yashoda Devi Ganga Pd., Patna District Bettiah, Ara District Old District Old Shahabad Motihari District l l l l Rashmi Bala Ushmi Bala Abhijit Daughter Daughter Son ... All are married ... Shashi Nishi Rishi Pawan Suman Sandhya Pragati Raman Bala Bala Bala Kumar Kumar Gond Kumar Daughter Daughter Daughter Gond son Son Daughter Daughter Son married married to married to unmarried unmarried married to married unmarried to O.P. Raghunath Birendra Chapra to Ajay Kr., Gond, Manjhi Sah Jharsuguda District Patna            Patna Lasia P.S.E in Sabalpur presently City Kurrudeg in District Gopalganj Patna Semdega in presently District the Ranchi Jharsuguda District (Orissa) Now Gumla now Gumla District District 3. A reading of this family history indicates that his claim as Scheduled Tribe is not only highly doubtful but beyond comprehension to believe that he is eligible for the same. Under the circumstances, we do not find any substance to interfere with the order of the High Court. However, it would be open for the appellant to be entitled to compete as a general candidate. 9. The appeals are accordingly dismissed but without any order as to costs. Appeals dismissed. Under the circumstances, we do not find any substance to interfere with the order of the High Court. However, it would be open for the appellant to be entitled to compete as a general candidate. 9. The appeals are accordingly dismissed but without any order as to costs. Appeals dismissed. ******* Parallel Citations of other Journals : Ramavatar v. State of Bihar, 1997(4) Supreme 335 : JT 1997(5) SC 644 00046