JUDGMENT 1. - Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the case of the prosecution is that the accused petitioner inflicted a dharia blow on the head of Dhan Singh, injured, and not on the person of Dungar Singh who died in the occurrence. He. therefore, submitted that the petitioner should be granted bail. 3. On the other hand, learned PP has opposed it. 4. I have gone through the challan papers, the FIR itself mentions that the accused had gone with Dharia in his hand. Of course he did not inflict injury to the deceased but he did cause injury with Dharia to Dhan Singh. Learned cousnel for the petitioner submitted that his injury is simple and was not dangerous to life to the person it was caused. 5. I have also gone through the medical report of Dhan Singh. The doctor has not mentioned that any of the injuries caused to him were sufficient in ordinary course of nature to cause his death. Of course another injured died to whom the petitioner did not touch. 6. In the facts and circumstances it is a fit case in which the accused should be enlarged on bail. 7. Hence this petition is allowed and it is ordered that if petitioner Amar Singh S/o Shri Khuman Singh furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10.000/- together with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance in the trial court on each and every date of hearing or whenever called upon to do so till final disposal of the trial, he shall be released on bail.> Bail granted. *******