Commissioner Of Sales Tax, M. P. v. Rewa Coal Fields LTD.
1997-04-09
K.T.THOMAS, SUHAS C.SEN
body1997
DigiLaw.ai
ORDER 1. These are cases under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958. The question is whether timber, kerosene, limestone and cement can be treated as raw material for the purpose of the Act."Raw Material" has been defined in Section 2(1) of the Act. On behalf of the respondent, it has been contended that the dispute is concluded by the principles laid down in the case of Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar [ (1994) 6 SCC 479 : (1995) 96 STC 211]. 2. Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. case [ (1994) 6 SCC 479 : (1995) 96 STC 211] was decided under the provisions of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981. In that case, reliance was placed upon the decision of this Court in the cases of J.K. Cotton Spg. & Wvg. Mills Co. Ltd. v. STO [(1965) 16 STC 563 : AIR 1965 SC 1310 ] and also Indian Copper Corpn. Ltd. v. Commr. of Commercial Taxes [(1965) 16 STC 259 : AIR 1965 SC 891 ] 3. Section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act lays down the rate of tax chargeable on sales in course of inter-State trade or commerce. It inter alia provides that every dealer who sells to a registered dealer other than government goods of the description referred to in sub-section (3) shall be liable to pay tax at the rate of 4 per cent of his turnover. The goods referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) has been described inter alia in clause (b) of sub-section (3). That apart, pursuant to the authority conferred by Section 13 of the Act, the Central Government made Rule 13 which provides as under : "13. The goods referred to in clause (6) of sub-section (3) of Section 8 which a registered dealer may purchase, shall be goods intended for use by him as raw materials, processing materials, machinery, plant, equipment, tools, stores, spare parts, accessories, fuel or lubricants, in the manufacture or processing of goods for sale or in mining, or in the generation or distribution of electricity or any other form of power." 4. The scope of Rule 13 fell for consideration in the case of Indian Copper Corpn. Ltd. [(1965) 16 STC 259 : AIR 1965 SC 891 ] as well as J.K. Cotton Spg. and Wvg. Mills Co.
The scope of Rule 13 fell for consideration in the case of Indian Copper Corpn. Ltd. [(1965) 16 STC 259 : AIR 1965 SC 891 ] as well as J.K. Cotton Spg. and Wvg. Mills Co. Ltd. [(1965) 16 STC 563 : AIR 1965 SC 1310 ]. We are here concerned with the Madhya Pradesh Finance Act. Nothing comparable to Rule 13 has been framed by the Madhya Pradesh Government. In Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. case [ (1994) 6 SCC 479 : (1995) 96 STC 211] the principles laid down in the aforesaid two judgments of J.K. Cotton Spg. and Wvg. Mills Co. Ltd. [(1965) 16 STC 563 : AIR 1965 SC 1310 ] and also Indian Copper Corpn. Ltd. [(1965) 16 STC 259 : AIR 1965 SC 891 ] were followed. It does not appear that there was anything corresponding to Rule 13 of the Central Sales Tax Rules framed under the Bihar Act. The respondent contended that the point at issue is now concluded by the principles laid down in Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Case [ (1994) 6 SCC 479 : (1995) 96 STC 211]. The material provisions of M.P. Act are substantially similar to the corresponding provisions of the Bihar Act. 5. The question is whether the law laid down by this Court in J.K. Cotton Spg. & Wvg. Mills Co. Ltd. [(1965) 16 STC 563 : AIR 1965 SC 1310 ] and Indian Copper Corpn. Ltd. [(1965) 16 STC 259 : AIR 1965 SC 891 ] will apply in full force to these cases under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958. 6. In our view, this question should be examined by a larger bench. This case may be placed before the Honble Chief Justice for appropriate orders.