Honble SHETHNA, J.–Looking to the gravity and seriousness of the offence alleged to have been committed by the petitioners accused, there is no question of granting anticipatory bail because the allegation against them is that they have assaulted public servants for which the offences have been registered against them under Sections 332, 353, 341, 34 IPC. Court cannot take such matter lightly and grant anticipatory bail. The way in which and the manner in which the offence is alleged to have been committed is sufficient to deny the bail as this type of tendency of assaulting public servants is increasing day by day. (2). The judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner reported in 1988 RCC 431 has no application to the facts of this case. (3). In view of the above, this bail application is dismissed.