ORDER : S.B. Majmudar, J. - Delay of 201 days is not satisfactorily explained. The review petition is therefore, liable to be dismissed as barred by limitation. However, as it concerns incarceration of the petitioner-accused who is convicted of the charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, we have considered the review petition on merit also. The only ground made out in the review petition is to the effect that the petitioner-accused is now 50 years of age and that he is likely to die during imprisonment. We fail to appreciate as to how that projects any error in the order under review which confirms the conviction and imprisonment. It has to be kept in view that the petitioner was involved in the charge of having murdered the deceased on 19-9-1978. At that time naturally he would be 30 years of age. Once the Court has convicted him of the offence with which he was charged, consequences will have to follow whatever may be the age of the accused at the time of order of the Court sentencing him to suffer imprisonment for life. There is no general exception in the Indian Penal Code that an accused of advanced age should not be deemed to be guilty of any offence. It has also to be noted that once conviction under Section 302 Indian Penal Code is rendered the minimum sentence which can be awarded is that of life imprisonment. 2. Under these circumstances, the review petition is dismissed as devoid of any merit also.