Honble SHETHNA, J.–Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. (2). For using unfair means against the petitioner, impugned order dated 29.8.96 was passed after giving him full opportunity. The only submission made by learned counsel Shri Vyas was that the impugned order at Annex.4 is not a reasoned order. They are not supposed to pass the reasoned order like us. From the record it appears that the petitioner was found using unfair means in the examination, therefore, the impugned order at Annex.4 was passed. This Court would not sit over the decision of an authority in appeal. No case is made out to exercise the extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, rejected.