Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

1998 DIGILAW 1245 (SC)

Jyotsna Suri v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

1998-10-16

G.B.PATTANAIK, SUJATA V.MANOHAR

body1998
ORDER : Sujata V. Manohar, J. - Special leave granted. 2. The Tribunal has disposed of the appeal by its order of 3rd Jan., 1997, without considering the pending application under Rule 29 of the ITAT Rules, 1963, for adducing additional evidence. Obviously, that application was required to be disposed of first before the Tribunal heard the appeal on merits. The appellant also undertakes to withdraw the pending application before the Tribunal for making a reference under Section 256(1) of the IT Act for the above purpose. In view thereof, we direct that the Tribunal should first dispose of the application under Rule 29 on merits and thereafter proceed to dispose of the appeal on merits. The order dated 3rd January 1997, is, therefore, set aside and the matter is remitted to the Tribunal for disposal on merit in accordance with law. The order of the High Court is set aside as above and the appeal is disposed of accordingly.