JUDGMENT Learned Counsel for the respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petition is not maintainable under Article 227 of the Constitution. He placed reliance upon 1998 LLR 154 (Ram Sahai Yadav v. M.P. State Road Transport Corporation) and argued that in a similar case the petitioner was granted relief by the Labour Court. Thereafter the order was challenged before this Court and a Division Bench held that the findings of fact arrived at by the Court below could not be disturbed in exercise of jurisdiction conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was removed from service. He was a daily wages worker and worked for 240 days. He moved the Labour Court and the Labour Court awarded reinstatement. Thereafter the Industrial Court set aside that order. Hence this petition. Considered the contentions. A perusal of the impugned order shows that the Court below had arrived at findings of fact which cannot be assailed in writ jurisdiction unless it is shown that the findings are perverse and require interference by this Court in extraordinary jurisdiction. In view of the law laid down in Division Bench decision of this Court relied upon by the learned Counsel for the respondents, no interference is called for. The petition is summarily dismissed.