Judgment :- JAYASIMHA BABU, J The Revenue contends that the urban land tax and corporation tax paid by the owner of the urban land cannot properly be regarded as part of the cost of the acquisition of the land for the purpose of determining the capital gains arising to the owner at the time of transfer of the land. Sec. 48 of the Act which deals with the mode of computation rules that the capital gains shall be computed excluding the expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with such transfer, as also the cost of acquisition of the capital asset and the cost of any improvement thereto. Urban land tax and corporation tax does not fall under any of the heads. The payment of tax is one of the items of costs holding the land. 2. Payment of such tax, the land by the owner (sic-by the land owner) does not form part of the cost of acquisition, nor is it part of the expenditure incurred by the owner in connection with the transfer payment of tax also does not amount to improvement of the land. The Tribunal, therefore, as rightly contended by the counsel for the Revenue, was in error in holding that the urban land tax and corporation tax paid by the assessee-on the 44 grounds and 1, 578 sq. ft. of land which was sold by it-from the date on which land was purchased by the assessee till the time of the sale to several persons, should be deducted under s. 48 of the Act. 3. The Supreme Court in the case of R. M. Arunachalam vs. CIT, while considering the cost of acquisition of a capital asset on sale of which capital gains liable to tax arises, has held that estate duty paid by the assessee to inherit the property is not a charge creating an interest in the property and it does not form part of the cost of the acquisition. 4. The question referred to us for the asst. yr. 4. The question referred to us for the asst. yr. 1976-77, at the instance of the Revenue, namely, "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and having regard to the provisions of Part E of Chapter IV of the IT Act, 1961, the Tribunal was right in holding that urban land tax and other taxes paid by the assessee would form part of cost of acquisition of the property and should be deducted while computing the short-term capital gains in the assessee's case" is, therefore, answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. The Revenue shall be entitled to costs in the sum of Rs. 1, 500.