JUDGMENT S.K. Dubey, J. 1. Appellants are the claimants, who have filed this appeal for enhancement of compensation awarded in Claim Case No. 42 of 1994 vide award dated 30.8.1996 passed by First Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Seoni. 2. It is not in dispute that the deceased Pitambar Tiwari, aged 23 years, was a boxer of national level, who died in motor accident caused by stage carriage bus No. MP-07-F-0279 driven by respondent No. 2, during the course of employment with respondent No. 1, in the intervening night of 27 and 28.7.1994. The Tribunal held that the accident was caused due to the sole negligence of the driver of the bus, as the bus dashed the motor cycle of the deceased. The Tribunal also found that the deceased was a boxer of national level and was also a coach. But, as the deceased was working on daily wages as a pump attendant in the Municipal Corporation at Jabalpur and that work was not regular, assessed monthly dependency at Rs. 400, i.e., yearly Rs. 4,800 wherein multiplier of 16 was applied and the amount was worked out to Rs. 76,800. In that Rs. 10,000 was added for mental pain and shock. The total amount was arrived at Rs. 86,800 and was rounded off to Rs. 87,000, which was awarded with interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum from the date of application, i.e., 12.9.1994 till realisation. 3. We have heard Mr. R.K. Verma, counsel for the appellants and Mr. A.G. Dhande, counsel for the respondents. 4. The deceased was the only son of the appellants, is not disputed, who was maintaining the appellants, as the appellant No. 1 had retired from service long back. It has come in evidence that the deceased was getting Rs. 40 per day as a daily wager from Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur. Therefore, his earning has to be calculated for 25 days, which would come to Rs. 1,000. There is also evidence that besides working as a pump attendant, the deceased was coaching the boxers at Jabalpur and from that, though appellants have claimed Rs. 1,500 as his earning, but, in fact, from the evidence the earning has been established at Rs. 1,000 per month. Thus, the total would come to Rs. 2,000 per month. From this, if Rs. 1,500 as his earning, but, in fact, from the evidence the earning has been established at Rs. 1,000 per month. Thus, the total would come to Rs. 2,000 per month. From this, if Rs. 700 is deducted for personal living expenses of the deceased, the dependency would come to Rs. 1,300 per month, i.e., Rs. 15,600 yearly. Looking to the age of the deceased and that of the appellants, the multiplier of 11 is applied, the amount would work out to Rs. 1,71,600. In this Rs. 10,000 is awarded towards loss to the estate and Rs. 2,000 for funeral expenses that would make the total of Rs. 1,83,600. Besides the appellants would also be entitled to Rs. 1,000 for transportation of the dead body from place of incident to Jabalpur and also Rs. 5,000 for damage caused to the motor cycle as the appellants have not led any evidence about the extent of damage and the value of the motor cycle. Thus the total amount of compensation comes to Rs. 1,89,600, which is rounded off to Rs. 1,90,000. The appellants would be entitled to interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum thereon from the date of application, i.e., 12.9.1994, till realisation from the respondents jointly or severally. 5. The respondents shall deposit the amount of compensation so enhanced with its accrued interest less the amount already deposited by the respondent No. 1, within a period of two months from the date of supply of certified copy of the order, failing which, the amount shall carry interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum. On deposit, the amount shall be disbursed to the appellants, keeping in mind the well settled guidelines laid down by the Apex Court. 6. In the result, the appeal is allowed. The award of the Tribunal shall stand substituted as indicated hereinabove. The appellants shall get costs of this appeal. Counsel's fee Rs. 1,000, if pre-certified. C.C. be given as per rules.