JUDGMENT 1. - This revision is directed against the order of taking cognizance. The learned Magistrate has ordered issue of warrant of arrest also after taking cognizance. 2. While-assailing the order, it is submitted by the learned counsel that several aspects of the case particularly pendency of civil dispute between parties in relation to the property namely the tractor is already pending has not been taken into consideration while taking cognizance of the matter. 3. Cognizance is to be taken on prima facie case as disclosed by the investigating papers. The learned Magistrate can be moved again at the time when charges are to be framed to discharge the accused persons if no prima facie case is disclosed at that stage. The petitioner shall have a liberty to do so. Hence, at this stage, I see no reason to interfere with the order of taking cognizance. The revision petition is dismissed. The accused to appear in the trial Court on 17.4.1998 and on his presenting himself, the warrant will not be executed and he be released on bail for a reasonable amount.Petition disposed of with direction. *******