K. Ramamoorthy, J. ( 1 ) THE writ petitioner has challenged the order of termination dated 31. 5. 1996 which was confirmed by the Appellate Authority on 11. 12. 1996. The first respondent held a domestic inquiry and on the basis of the findings rendered in the domestic inquiry, the services of the petitioner were terminated. The petitioner has raised questions of facts which are disputed by the first respondent. The proper remedy available to the petitioner is to raise an industrial dispute. ( 2 ). In this view, I do not want to go into the consideration of the contentions of the parties on facts. Reserving the rights of the writ petitioner to raise an industrial dispute, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.