JUDGMENT 1. - This revision petition is directed against the judgment of learned Sessions Judge, Sri Karanpur dated 25.4.1998 whereby the judgment and order of dated 7.6.1995 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Padampur was confirmed. 2. The petitioners have been convicted of the offences under sections 457 & 380 IPC. They have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years on each count and a fine of Rs. 100 /- or in default one and half months simple imprisonment. 3. The present revision petition was admitted for hearing. The notices were given to the learned Public Prosecutor. 4. I have heard the arguments. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has urged that the petitioners have faced trial since 1988 and no previous conviction has been brought on record against them. Petitioner No. 2-Shankaria has remained in jail for 12 months and 12 days. Similarly, Pathania has also remained in jail for two months and 11 days. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not argued the matter on merits. It is contended that the petitioners sentence may be reduced to already undergone. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the contention. It is submitted that petitioner No. 1-Pathania has only undergone two months and 11 days simple imprisonment. According to him looking to the nature of offence adequate punishment could be passed against them. 6. I have.given my anxious consideration to the rival submissions. 7. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to accept the contention of learned counsel for the petitioners for reducing the sentence to already undergone. The petitioners have already deposited the fine. 8. Consequently, the present petition is partly allowed, the conviction of the petitioners under sections 457 and 380 IPC by the impugned judgment is hereby maintained. However, the sentences imposed upon the petitioners are reduced to already undergone. The petitioners shall be released if not required in any other case.Revision party allowed. *******