JUDGMENT 1. - By the agreement of the parties, the arguments were finally heard in these revision petitions. 2. These two revision petitions are filed against the order of the trial Court dated 9.1.1997 whereby the trial Court found that the defendants had not been able to show any good cause for taking the document on record, under Order 13 Rule 2 CPC. 3. Once the trial Court had found that no sufficient reason has been shown for taking the document on record then the Court should not have proceeded to pass the impugned order allowing the application. Since trial Court has observed that there are no good reasons for taking the document on record, then it ought not to have allowed the application. The trial Court perhaps was not right in passing this order. Therefore, the order impugned in the revision petition deserves to be set aside. 4. The impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the trial Court for deciding the application afresh. The trial Court should examine the matter in the light of the provisions of Order 13 Rule 2 Civil Procedure Code. and the application may only be allowed if it is in terms of the provisions of Order 13 Rule 2, CPC. 5. With these observations, these revision petitions are disposed of and the matter is remanded back to the Trial Court for fresh decision.Petition disposed of. *******