Judgment R.R. Yadav, J.-The aforesaid Criminal Murder Reference No. 01/98, Criminal Jail Appeal No. 121 /98 and represented Criminal Appeal No. 106/98, arise out of same impugned Judgment , dated 6-2-1998, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, No. 3, Udaipur, in Sessions Case No. 3 9/97 (234/97) whereby he convicted accused appellant Khuma for the offence under Section 302., IPC and sentenced him to death and a fine of Rs. 100/-in default of payment of fine to undergo further 15 days’ simple imprisonment. Learned trial Court also convicted accused appellant named above for the offence under Section 397, IPC and sentenced him to seven years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo one month’s rigorous imprisonment. Learned Additional Sessions Judge also convicted the accused appellant for the offence under Section 201, IPC and sentenced him to four years’ rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo one month’s simple imprisonment. 2. Thesentences imposed to accused appellant Khuma under Sees. 397 and 201, IPC have been ordered to run concurrently. 3. This common Judgment will dispose of Murder Reference, Jail Appeal and represented Appeal filed by the accused appellant Khuma, as these are directed against one and same impugned Judgment passed by the learned trial Court. 4. The brief facts leading to Murder Reference and two appeals filed by the accused appellant Khuma are as follows: 5. It is alleged that on 1-5-1997, PW3 Abhay Singh and his younger brother PW5 Badan Singh had gone to collect firewoods. After collecting fire-woods both PW3 Abhay Singh and his younger brother PW5 Badan Singh started to feel uneasiness for want of drinking water and they lowered down their kettle tied with rope in their well to draw water from the well to quench their thirst. In process of doing so, both brothers saw a dead body floating in their well. They informed to Sarpanch Kailash Dave (PW 25) who advised them to inform to Station House Officer, Police Station, Kheroda telephonically. After getting the aforesaid advise from Sarpanch Kailash Dave, PW3 Abhay Singh informed Bhanwar Singh (PW 35), Station House Officer, Police Station, Kheroda telephonically. In process of doing so, both brothers saw a dead body floating in their well. They informed to Sarpanch Kailash Dave (PW 25) who advised them to inform to Station House Officer, Police Station, Kheroda telephonically. After getting the aforesaid advise from Sarpanch Kailash Dave, PW3 Abhay Singh informed Bhanwar Singh (PW 35), Station House Officer, Police Station, Kheroda telephonically. Bhanwar Singh, Station House Officer, Kheroda, immediately proceeded to the well of Abhay Singh (PW 3) in village Mori, after lodging the Mrig FIR No. 2/97 at Police Station, Kheroda. 6. On search with the help of a petromax, it was found that there were two bodies floating inside the well. One dead body was noticed to be of a woman & Anr. dead body was noticed to be of a child, aged one and half years. These dead bodies were located inside the well on 01 -5-1997, but due to non-availability of means and also looking to the dangerous depth and overall condition of the well, the recovery of the dead bodies in the night from the well was postponed by PW35 Bhanwar Singh. These two dead bodies were taken out from the well on 2-5-1997 in the day-time. The dead bodies were identified to be of deceased Mst. Laxmi wife of Mangi Lal and her daughter Vidya alias Meera, of village Mon. 7. The dead bodies of deceased Laxmi and her daughter Vidya alias Meera were subjected to post mortem by the Medical Jurist (PW34) Dr. Devendra Singh, which revealed homicidal death of Mst. Laxmi and Vidya alias Meera due to violence. Post Mortem report Ex. P33 of deceased Vidya alias Meera and Ex. P34 of Mst. Laxmi further revealed cause of death of each one of them coma due to ante mortem injuries noted in their respective autopsy reports, mentioned above. 8. PW6 Mangi Lal after intimation of the aforesaid occurrence informed that his wife Mst. Laxmi (deceased) used to wear silver ‘kadiyas’ in her feet which are missing. 9. On the aforesaid information, FIR No. 75/ 97 (Ex. P35) for the offences under Sections 302, 397 and 201, IPC was registered at Police Station, Kheroda and investigation commenced. 10. During the course of investigation, appellant Khuma was arrested on 5-5-1997 and on his personal search, it is alleged that he was carrying two silver ‘kadiya’ in his hand, which were seized vide recovery memo Ex. P35) for the offences under Sections 302, 397 and 201, IPC was registered at Police Station, Kheroda and investigation commenced. 10. During the course of investigation, appellant Khuma was arrested on 5-5-1997 and on his personal search, it is alleged that he was carrying two silver ‘kadiya’ in his hand, which were seized vide recovery memo Ex. P9 by the Investigating Officer in presence of the motbir witnesses. It is also alleged that thereafter at pointing out of accused appellant Khuma, the place of occurrence was identified and blood stained articles were recovered vide Ex. P12. 10.11. After conclusion of investigation, a challan was filed against accused appellant Khuma for the offences under Sections 302, 397 and 201, IPC, before committal Court. The committal Court committed the case to the Court of Session Judge, Udaipur, who transferred the same to the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, No. 3, Udaipur for trial. 112. The learned trial Court framed charges against the accused appellant for the offences under Sections 302, 397 and 201, IPC. The accused appellant pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. 113. At the trial, the prosecution examined as many as 35 witnesses and produced documentary evidence from Ex. P1 to Ex. P40 in support of its case. 114. Accused appellant Khuma in his statement under Section 313, Cr. P.C. denied to have committed any offence and he claimed himself to be innocent. It is stated by accused appellant Khuma in his statement under Section 313, Cr. P.C. that he was labourer of Khem Raj Mali (PW12). It was PW12 Khem Raj Mali who got recovered two silver ‘kadiyas’ of deceased Mst. Laxmi from the house of Patwari. He denied any recovery made from him. It is stated by him that he had never gone to the house of deceased Laxmi. He had committed no offence. 115. The prosecution, at the trial, led circumstantial evidence to the effect that deceased Laxini was last seen in the company of accused appellant Khuma, recovery of two silver ‘kadiyas’ of deceased Laxmi from possession of accused appellant soon after the occurrence vide Ex. P9 and recovery of blood stained articles vide Ex. P12 made at the instance of accused appellant. The learned trial Court placing reliance on the aforesaid circumstantial evidence, proceeded to convict and sentence the accused appellant Khuma as stated in the preceding paragraphs of this Judgment . 116. P9 and recovery of blood stained articles vide Ex. P12 made at the instance of accused appellant. The learned trial Court placing reliance on the aforesaid circumstantial evidence, proceeded to convict and sentence the accused appellant Khuma as stated in the preceding paragraphs of this Judgment . 116. We have heard learned counsel Mr. Sandeep Mehta, appearing on behalf of accused appellant and learned Public Prosecutor at length. 117. We have gone through the oral and documentary evidence on record with the assistance of learned counsel for the appellant Shri Mehta and learned Public Prosecutor, which reveals that there is no direct evidence in the case to show that accused appellant Khuma has committed murder, robbery and caused disappearance of evidence of any offence. The entire case of the prosecution rests on circumstantial evidence. .18. Before addressing the rival contentions raised at the Bar, we think it proper to observe that there are series of decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court propounding cardinal principles to be followed in cases in which nature of evidence is circumstantial. It is not practicable for us to recaptulate all decisions rendered by the Apex Court except stating essential ingredients, as noticed by Hon’ble Pandian, J., speaking for the Court in State of U. P. vs. Ravindra Prakash Mittal (1992) 3 SCC (Cri) 300 : AIR 1992 SC 2045 : 1992 CriLJ 3693. The ingredients of circumstantial evidence approved by their Lordships of Supreme Court in paragraph 20 of the decision rendered in case of Dr. R. P. Mittal (supra), are reproduced hereinbelow, which reads thus: .(1) the circumstances from which the conclusion is drawn should be fully proved; .(2) the circumstances should be conclusive in nature; .(3) allthe facts so established should be consistent only with the hypothesis of guilt and inconsistent with the innocence; .(4) the circumstances should, to a moral certainty, exclude the possibility of guilt of any person other than the accused. Vide Rama Nand vs. State of H. P. AIR 1981 SC 738 : 1981 CriLJ 298; Gambir vs. State of Maharashtra AIR 1982 SC 1157 : 1982 CriLJ 1243; Earabhadrappa vs. State of Karnataka AIR 1983 SC 446 : 1983 CriLJ 846; Ram Avtar vs. State of Delhi Administration AIR 1985 SC 1692 : 1985 CriLJ 1865. 119. Vide Rama Nand vs. State of H. P. AIR 1981 SC 738 : 1981 CriLJ 298; Gambir vs. State of Maharashtra AIR 1982 SC 1157 : 1982 CriLJ 1243; Earabhadrappa vs. State of Karnataka AIR 1983 SC 446 : 1983 CriLJ 846; Ram Avtar vs. State of Delhi Administration AIR 1985 SC 1692 : 1985 CriLJ 1865. 119. With the aforesaid circumspection, let us examine the impelling circumstances attending the case on hand and analyse in the light of rival contentions raised at the Bar, whether the cumulative effect of those circumstances relied upon by the learned Additional Sessions Judge negatived the plea of innocence of accused appellant Khuma and serves as a definite pointer towards his guilt and unerringly leads to the conclusion that within all human probability, the offences alleged against him by the prosecution agency were committed by him alone and none else. .20. Now time is ripe to consider the rival contentions raised at the Bar. At the first instance, it is urged by the learned counsel for the accused appellant that only witness regarding last seen is PW7 Smt. Dauli who deposed that deceased Laxmi was sitting near her in the evening at about 7.00 p.m. where accused appellant Khuma came. After arrival of accused appellant Khuma, deceased Laxmi went to her house and accused .appellant followed her. It is vehemently urged before us by the learned counsel for the appellant that in the present case the prosecution has miserably failed to establish from the statement of PW7 Mst. Dauli that deceased Laxmi was last seen in the company of accused appellant Khuma. 121. Thelearned Public Prosecutor with equal emphasis urged before us that in the present case, the prosecution has succeeded to establish beyond reasonable doubt that deceased Mst. Laxmi was last seen in the company of accused appellant Khuma on 28-4-97 before her death. Learned Public Prosecutor invited our attention towards the sworn testimonies of PW 7 Mst. Dauli, PW 8 Mst. Isha and PW 30 Bhagwati Lal in support of his aforesaid contention. 19.22. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the aforesaid arguments raised at the Bar. It is evident from perusal of the record that the prosecution has examined PW 7 Mst. Dauli, PW 8 Mst. Isha and PW 30 Bhagwati Lal to establish that deceased Mst. Isha and PW 30 Bhagwati Lal in support of his aforesaid contention. 19.22. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the aforesaid arguments raised at the Bar. It is evident from perusal of the record that the prosecution has examined PW 7 Mst. Dauli, PW 8 Mst. Isha and PW 30 Bhagwati Lal to establish that deceased Mst. Laxmi was last seen alive in the company of accused-appellant Khuma before her death. PW 7 Mst. Dauli has deposed that she was sitting outside of her house at about 7.00 p.m. wheredeceased Mst. Laxmi was also sitting near her. At that time, her sister’s son PW 30 Bhagwati Lal was also sitting with them and all of them were talking with each other. It is stated that while they were talking with each other, accused-appellant Khuma came there. After arrival of accused-appellant Khuma, Mst. Laxmi had gone inside her house. The accused-appellant also went with her. In her cross-examination, Mst. Dauli has admitted that she could not identify accused-appellant Khuma by his face because her faculty of sight is weak. It is deposed by her that her visibility is further reduced in night. She cannot identify a person by face even if he happens to pass near her. 23. A close scrutiny of the statement of PW7 Mst. Dauli throws a flood of light that she has never stated that she had identified accused appellant Khuma by his speech or words spoken by him. The statement of PW7-Mst. Dauli further leads towards an irresistible conclusion that it is nowhere stated by her that accused appellant Khuma had spoken some words through which she could claim to have identified him. 24. It is urged by the learned Public Prosecutor that as PW 7 Mst. Dauli and accused-appellant Khuma are of the same village, therefore, it should be presumed that PW 7 Mst. Dauli had identified the accused-appellant by his speech. According to the learned Public Prosecutor, the learned trial Court has committed no error in raising presumption in this regard. The aforesaid argument of learned Public Prosecutor regarding presumption in favour of prosecution as raised by the learned trial Court to the effect that PW 7 Mst. Dauli had identified the accused-appellant from his speech or words spoken by him in absence of any evidence in this regard is not acceptable to us. The aforesaid argument of learned Public Prosecutor regarding presumption in favour of prosecution as raised by the learned trial Court to the effect that PW 7 Mst. Dauli had identified the accused-appellant from his speech or words spoken by him in absence of any evidence in this regard is not acceptable to us. There is no law for raising presumption about a fact which is required to be proved by oral evidence within the meaning of Section 60 of the Evidence Act which provides that oral evidence in all the cases be direct that is to say if it refers to a fact which could be seen it must be the evidence of a witness who says he saw it, if it refers to a fact which could be heard it must be the evidence of a witness who says he heard it; if it refers to a fact which could be perceived by any other sense or in any manner, it must be the evidence of a witness who says he perceived it by that manner. 25. Only what PW 7 Mst. Dauli directly saw and heard regarding accused-appellant Khuma last seen with deceased Mst. Laxmi is admissible not her opinion if she failed to recognise accused-appellant Khuma by his face due to her weak eye sight. We are of the view that the evidence of the senses of a person who is called as a witness must have direct correlation with his or her any sense of perception not his or her mere opinion unless he or she is an expert witness within the meaning of the proviso added to Section 60 ot the Evidence Act. The statement of PW 7 Mst. Dauli in the present case regarding proof of Mst. Laxmi to have been last seen alive in the company of accused-appellant Khuma before her death, is beyond the scope of Section 60 of the Evidence Act which prohibits hearsay and opinion of a witness unless he or she is an expert witness. The learned trial Court has committed an error in evaluating and relying upon the statement of PW 7 Mst. Dauli on the aforesaid point in utter ignorance of Section 60 of the Evidence Act. 26. Thus, from the statement of PW7 Mst. The learned trial Court has committed an error in evaluating and relying upon the statement of PW 7 Mst. Dauli on the aforesaid point in utter ignorance of Section 60 of the Evidence Act. 26. Thus, from the statement of PW7 Mst. Dauli, the case put forth by the prosecution regarding deceased Laxmi to have been last seen alive in the company of accused appellant Khuma, cannot be said to be proved beyond reasonable doubt. No inference can be drawn, as suggested by learned Public Prosecutor, that PW7 should be presumed to have identified the accused appellant by words spoken by him. Learned trial Court erred in relying upon the deposition of PW7-Mst. Dauli to prove factum of deceased Laxmi to have been last seen alive in the company of accused appellant Khuma. 27. Thestatement of PW7 Mst. Dauli is not supported by her sister’s son PW 30 Bhagwati Lal. PW 30 Bhagwati Lal has stated on oath before the learned trial Court that PW 7 Mst. Dauli who is his Mousi (his mother’s sister) is living alone in village Mon in the neighbourhood of deceased Laxmi PW 30 Bhagwati Lal admitted his presence at the house of PW7 Mst. Dauli with deceased Mst. Laxmi at the relevant time. He has further admitted that he saw PW 7 Mst. Dauli and deceased Mst. Laxmi sitting and talking together on a Chabutra but he denied the arrival of accused-appellant Khuma there at the house of PW 7 Mst. Dauli. Although PW 30 Bhagwati Lal is declared hostile by the prosecution agency but his aforesaid deposition is corroborated by PW 8 Mst. Isha who has been examined by the prosecution to prove the concocted story of deceased Laxmi to have been last seen alive in the company of accused-appellant Khuma. Statement of PW8 on oath did not support the story of last seen. PW 8 Mst. Isha in her examination-in-chief stated that she saw in the evening deceased Laxmi before her death sitting with PW 7 Mst. Dauli but she did not see accused-appellant Khuma with them. It is further stated by PW 8 Mst. Isha that she knew accused-appellant Khuma from before but she did not see him in the house of deceased Mst. Laxmi before her death. PW 8 Mst. Isha has not been declared hostile by the prosecution, therefore, her statement is to be believed. 28. It is further stated by PW 8 Mst. Isha that she knew accused-appellant Khuma from before but she did not see him in the house of deceased Mst. Laxmi before her death. PW 8 Mst. Isha has not been declared hostile by the prosecution, therefore, her statement is to be believed. 28. Fromthe statement of PW 7 Mst. Dauli, PW 8 Mst. Isha and PW 30 Bhagwati Lal, the prosecution has failed to establish that deceased Mst. Laxmi was last seen alive in the company of accused-appellant Khuma before her death. The learned trial Court has not properly evaluated the testimonial value of PW 7 Mst. Dauli, PW 8 Mst. Isha and PW 30 Bhagwati Lal and as such, his appreciation of testimonial value of the aforesaid witnesses are not acceptable to us. 29. It is next contended by the learned counsel tor the appellant that as regards the circumstance of recovery of two silver Kadias from possession of accused-appellant Khuma, it is highly improbable to believe that after recovery of dead-bodies of deceased Mst. Laxmi and her daughter Vidya alias Meera by the Investigating Officer inside the well of PW 3 Abhey Singh on 1-5-97 and after red alert was sounded by Police to apprehend the accused not only in village Mon but in the neighbouring villages, therefore, in such a situation, it is unbelievable that the accused-appellant Khuma was carrying two silver Kadias Article s 1 and 2 in his hand so as to create evidence against himself after committing heinous crime of murder robbery and causing disappearance of evidence. According to the learned counsel for the appellant, once the dead bodies of deceased Mst. Laxmi and her daughter Vidya alias Meera were detected in the well of PW 3 Abhey Singh, it is unbelievable that accused-appellant Khuma was roaming in the adjoining village Changed with two silver kadiyas in his hand. 30. Theaforesaid argument of the learned counsel for the appellant deserves to be tested with reference to Ex. 8-Arrest and personal search memo of accused-appellant Khuma and Ex. P19-Recovery memo of two silver Kadias together with deposition of Investigating Officer PW 35 Bhanwar Singh, PW 15 Mohammed Mushtaq, PW 16 Udai Singh, PW 19 Pushkar Lal Soni (Goldsmith) PW 23 Liyaqat Hussain (Naib Tehsildar) who is alleged to have conducted identification test of two silver Kadiyas, PW 6 Mangi Lal, PW 7 Mst. P19-Recovery memo of two silver Kadias together with deposition of Investigating Officer PW 35 Bhanwar Singh, PW 15 Mohammed Mushtaq, PW 16 Udai Singh, PW 19 Pushkar Lal Soni (Goldsmith) PW 23 Liyaqat Hussain (Naib Tehsildar) who is alleged to have conducted identification test of two silver Kadiyas, PW 6 Mangi Lal, PW 7 Mst. Dauli, PW 8 Mst. Isha and PW 10 Vardi. 4.31. It is evident from perusal of Ex. P/8 and Ex. P/9, that accused-appellant Khuma was arrested on 5-5-97 in village Changeri and from his possession two silver Kadias (Articles 1 and 2) which it is alleged he was carrying in a plastic bag wrapped with dhoti were recovered. It is observed by the Investigating Officer while preparing recovery memo Ex. P9 that one silver ‘kadiya’ was broken recently and its broken pieces are also recovered whereas other silver ‘kadiyas’ was broken in the past. Both silver ‘kadiyas’ weighed on the spot by PW19 Pushkar Lal Soni and its measurement was found to be 880 gms. These two silver ‘kadiyas’ were sealed on the spot, according to Investigating Officer. 5.32. It is to be noticed that the aforesaid fact, mentioned in Ex. P9 and stated by Investigating Officer PW35 Bhanwar Singh, before the trial Court, is not supported by witnesses of recovery PW15 Mohammed Mushtaq, PW16 Udai Singh and PW19 Pushkar Lal Soni. It is stated by PW15 Mohd. Mushtaq that recovery memo Ex. P9 was prepared in village Changeri, after its recovery from the accused appellant in the field of PW16 Udai Singh. These two silver kadiyas (Article s 1 and 2) were sealed in village Changeri and thereafter it were taken to Fatehnagar for its weighment whereas according to PW16 Udai Singh, these two silver ‘kadiyas’ were sent Fatehnagar and after its weighment, Article s 1 and 2 were sealed. It is not disclosed by PW1 6 Udai Singh at which place two silver ‘kadiyas’, articles 1 and 2 were sealed. It is not decipherable from the statement of PW16 Udai Singh as to whether these two silver ‘kadiyas’ were sealed on the spot as described by Investigating Officer in Ex. P9, recovery memo prepared by him and stated so on oath by him or at village Changeri, as stated by PW15 Mohammed Mushtaq, or at Fatehnagar as deposed by PW19 Pushkar Lal Soni (goldsmith). P9, recovery memo prepared by him and stated so on oath by him or at village Changeri, as stated by PW15 Mohammed Mushtaq, or at Fatehnagar as deposed by PW19 Pushkar Lal Soni (goldsmith). In his cross-examination, PW 19 Pushkar Lal Soni has stated that recovery memo Ex. P 9 was sealed at Fatehnagar which is found to be contradictory from his statement given in his examination-in-chief , expressing his ignorance on this point. 33. PW 6 Mangi Lal husband of deceased Laxmi stated on oath that before identification test of two silver ‘kadiyas’ (articles 1 and 2) at Tehsil headquarter, the Investigating Officer has shown him these two silver ‘kadiyas’ at police station. It is categorically stated by PW 6 Mangi Lal that at the time of test identification of two silver ‘kadiyas’ (articles 1 and 2), no other similar ‘kadiyas’ were mixed with it. PW 7 Mst. Dauli has deposed that no other similar ‘kadiyas’ were mixed with Article s Nos. 1 and 2 at the time of test identification at Tehsil headquarter. PW 10 Mst. Vardi deposed on oath that silver ‘kadiyas’ (articles 1 and 2) were shown to her at police station before test identification but at the same breath, she stated that these silver ‘kadiyas’ (Articles 1 and 2) were shown to her at Tehsil headquarter and not at police station. She has categorically stated that these two silver ‘kadiyas’ (articles 1 and 2) were not mixed up with any other similar silver ‘kadiyas’ at the time of identification test. PW 23 Liyaqat Hussain Naib Tehsilder, Bhinder stated on oath that on 2-7-97 he conducted identification test of two silver ‘kadiyas’ (articles 1 and 2) by mixing three other similar ‘kadiyas’ with them but in cross-examination he failed to name the person who brought other three pairs of similar silver ‘kadiyas’ for the purpose of mixing with articles 1 and 2 in identification test. It is admitted by PW 23 Liyaqat Hussain that other three similar siver ‘kadiyas’ mixed up with Article s 1 and 2, were not broken hence we are of the view that identification test of these two silver ‘kadiyas’ (Article s 1 and 2) at Tehsil headquarter is farce and ridiculous and has no evidentiary value at all. 6.34. We decline to raise presumption to the test identification of two silver ‘kadiyas’ (Article s Nos. 6.34. We decline to raise presumption to the test identification of two silver ‘kadiyas’ (Article s Nos. 1 and 2) conducted by PW 23 Liyaqat Hussain at Tehsil headquarter. It is for the prosecution to establish affirmatively that all necessary precautions were taken to ensure fair identification test. The most essential requirement is that the witnesses should not have had an opportunity of seeing the articles of identification after its recovery and before its identification before the Magistrate. For that purpose it is essential for the prosecution to establish that the seal of articles taken for identification before a Magistrate remained sealed from the time it were recovered till it is produced before a Magistrate for identification. The police officer who takes the sealed articles for identification before a Magistrate must be examined to prove that the sealed articles were not tampered in the way while taking these articles from Police Mallthana to the place of identification before a Magistrate which is lacking in the present case. The conduct of the Investigation Officer in preparing recovery memo Ex. P/9 and his conduct during identification test of these Article s 1 and 2 at Tehsil headquarter before PW 23 Liyaquat Hussain Mangi Lal (PW 6), Mst. Dauli (PW 7) and Mst. Vardi (PW 10) makes it crystal clear that he attempted to foist the crime of murder, robbery and causing disappearance of evidence on accused appellant Khuma. by fabricating Ex. P19 recovery memo of two silver ‘kadiyas’ from his possession and further made an attempt to manipulate identification test of these two silver ‘kadiyas’ before PW 23 Liyaquat Hussain. In such a situation, we decline to raise presumption of robbery causing disappearance of evidence what to say of murder of Mst. Laxmi and her daughter Vidya alias Meera against accused-appellant Khuma in the backdrop of fabrication and manipulation done by the Investigating Officer as discussed hereinabove. 7.35. Next circusmtance relied upon by the prosecution and believed by learned trial Court is alleged recovery of blood stained stones, three blood stained bones, blood stained gudri, burnt shawl, ashes, two keys, two safety pins, blood stained thread of “Dasamata” attached with blood soaked hairs, broken bangles at the instance of accused appellant near the field of PW 12 Khemraj Mali at a dilapidated well and recovery of blood stained chimta of a cycle. These recoveries which are alleged to have been made at the instance of accused-appellant are made from open places accessible to all and sundry, therefore, it cannot be said to have been recovered from exclusive possession of accused-appellant. It is stated that these articles recovered at the pointing out of accused appellant were blood stained, but a close scrutiny of Ex. P/40 report to State Forensic Science Laboratory, Rajasthan reveals that blood on these articles was not proved to be that of blood group either of deceased Mst. Laxmi or blood group of Vidya alias Meera. Much emphasis has been given by learned Public Prosecutor that three bones of deceased Mst. Laxmi from her head were found missing, therefore, it should be presumed that these three bones recovered at the pointing out of the accused-appellant which were found to be blood stained, should be held to be head bones of deceased Mst. Laxmi, as held by the learned trial Court. 8.36. Theaforesaid argument advanced by learned Public Prosecutor is not acceptable to us for the simple reason that the prosecution agency did not make an effort even to verify from the Serological Examination report as to whether these three bones alleged to have been recovered at pointing out of accused-appellant Khuma were of human bones and tallied with the bones found to be missing from the head of deceased Laxmi. It is shocking to note that no attempt was made to verify from the Serologist report as to whether hairs soaked with blood, attached with thread of “Dasamata” were of deceased Mst. Laxmi These facts and blood stained articles alleged to have been recovered at the pointing out of accused appellant Khuma cannot be proved by raising presumption in favour of the prosecution. 9.37. Looking into the facts and circumstances of the present case, we are of the opinion that recovery of these articles at the instance of accused-appellant Khuma are not free from doubt and appeared to us tainted hence these circumstances cannot be said to be incriminating against accused-appellant Khuma, together with other circumstances discussed hereinabove. 10.38. Fromthe evidence discussed hereinabove, we find that ingredients which are necessary to be satisfied before circumstantial evidence can be made basis of conviction, have not been fulfilled in the present case. In the instant case, the chain of circumstances are snapped. 10.38. Fromthe evidence discussed hereinabove, we find that ingredients which are necessary to be satisfied before circumstantial evidence can be made basis of conviction, have not been fulfilled in the present case. In the instant case, the chain of circumstances are snapped. The chain of circumstances in the present case do not indicate towards a conclusion beyond reasonable doubt that it is accused-appellant Khuma who in all human probability committed the offence alleged against him by the prosecution and none else. There may be suspicion against accused-appellant Khuma but suspicion cannot be allowed by a Court of judicial conscience to take place of evidence. The appro