JUDGMENT 1. - Heared. 2. The appellant challenges an order under section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act. He submits that there was no liability of the appellant because when the deceased was travelling in the Maruti Car belonging to the appellant, the car was hit from behind by a truck and because of that the accident occurred. In the matters under section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, the version given by the claimant has to be considered. When the claimants have come with a case that the driver of the Maruti Car belonging to the appellant was negligent in driving the statement cannot be ignored and it cannot be held at this stage that the appellant was not responsible even under no fault liability. I do not therefore, find that there is any illegality committed by the Tribunal in awarding statutory compensation on the basis of no fault liability. 3. There is also no force in the argument of the learned counsel for the appellant that actually it was a case of hit and run accident covered by Section 161 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The claim for compensation under Section 161 should be that of the claimants in case they are not able to identify the person or the vehicle responsible for causing the accident. When the claimants have come with a specific case of negligence on the part of the driver of the vehicle in which the deceased was travelling, no new case can be spinned out for the claimants and the case cannot be brought under Section 161 of the Motor Vehicles Act. 4. The appeal is dismissed without notice to the other side.Appeal dismissed. *******