Research › Browse › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

1998 DIGILAW 958 (RAJ)

Sheela Devi W/o Munnaram v. State of Rajasthan

1998-09-03

B.J.SHETHNA

body1998
JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present petitioners are lady-accused. Against them offences have been registered under sections 376, 342 Sr 120-B, IPC. At the request of the learned Public Prosecutor Mr. Vyas I have refrained myself to give reasons for granting anticipatory bail. considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, I think it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners-accused. 2. The I.O. of Police Station Jawahar Nagar, Sriganganagar in FIR No. 306/98 is, therefore, directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners (1) Smt. Sheela Devi W/o Munnaram, and (2) Smt. Vimla Devi W/o Dilip Kumar, they may be released on bail provided each one of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) together with one surety in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) to his satisfaction on the following conditions : (i) That the accused-petitioners shall make themselves available for inter-rogation by a Police Officer as and when required; (ii) That the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any other police officer; and, (iii) That the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. The application is allowed accordingly.Pre-arrest bail allowed. *******