Honble SHETHNA, J.–Heard the learned counsel for the parties. (2). In pursuance of the order dated 20.8.1998 passed by this Court, the I.O. investigated in the matter about the report made by the petitioner against the prosecutrix, which is found to be false. The learned Public Prosecutor has produced the report of the I.O. before me. (3). In view of the above, I do not see any reason to interfere with the order passed by the trial Court refusing to grant anticipatory bail. Against the present petitioners, a serious offence under Sec. 376 IPC is registered. The prosecutrix is aged only 20. I fully agree with the observations made by the learned Judge that ordinarily no Indian woman would file false complaint regarding rape against the accused. (4). Hence, this bail application is dismissed.