Honble SHETHNA, J.–Learned counsel Shri Bhandari submits that this is a case of circumstantial evidence and link is not complete, therefore, the accused should be released on bail. According to him, except recovery of silver ring and wrist watch worn by the deceased, nothing is against the accused. This is a weak piece of evidence on which no conviction can be based, therefore, he submits that the accused be released on bail. (2). Witnesses may tell lie but the circumstances may not. At this stage, there is some evidence in the form of recovery of material which was worn by the deceased i.e. wrist watch and silver ring. Merely because there is delay in recovery that itself would not be a circumstance for releasing the accused on bail. If the ch- ain of circumstantial evidence is complete then the accused can be convicted on such evidence. It may also be stated that in this case the accused has challenged the order dated 7.3.1998 passed by the learned Judge of refusing the bail. Before that, a bail petition was also filed which was dismissed as not pressed on 24.2.1998. The said order was not challenged before this Court or any other Court. One more argument was advanced by Mr. Bhandari that only two witnesses have been examined so far and there is no progress in the trial. For this he can make a grievance the learned Judge. In view of the above, this bail application is dismissed.