Research › Browse › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

1999 DIGILAW 1007 (PAT)

Tameshwar Prasad Singh v. State Of Bihar

1999-09-28

RADHA MOHAN PRASAD

body1999
Judgment 1. In this writ petition the disptue, in fact, is in regard to fixation of pay of the petitioner in the revised scale with effect from 25.2.1986. According to the petitioner, he was entitled for fixation of his pay at Rs. 1560/- on 25.2.1986 whereas, according to the learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the Accountant General, the petitioner was entitled for fixation of his pay at Rs. 1520/- on 25.2.1986 on completion of 12 years of his service, it is stated that the petitioner continued to get the pay on the basis of the said fixation of his pay till he superannuated from service on 31.12.1996. 2. There appears to be substance in the said submission of the learned Additional Standing Counsel that the pay of the petitioner on 25.2.1986 was wrongly fixed at Rs. 1560/- instead of Rs.1520+10. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submitted that in any view of the matter, no recovery is permissible of the emolument that the petitioner received pursuant to fixation of his pay since 25.2.1986 in the absence of any findng of misrepresentation or commission of fraud by the petitioner. 3. There is no allegation by the respondents that the petitioners pay was wrongly fixed on account of any misrepresentation or fraud committed by him. By now it is well settled that recovery of the alleged excess payment on the above ground is not permissible after such a long lapse of time. A reference can be made to the decisions of the Apex Court in the case of State of Bihar V/s. Nara Simha Sundram ( AIR 1994 S.C. 599 : 1994 (1) PLJR (SC) 101) and in the case of Sahib Ram V/s. State of Haryana [1995 Supp (1) SCC 18]. However, there cannot be any justification to direct the authority to fix the pensionary benefits on the basis of wrong fixation of pay. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that no recovery of the alleged excess amount on the basis of wrong fixation of pay shall be made from the petitioner but the petitioner cannot claim refixation of his pension on the basis of wrong fixation of his pay.