JUDGMENT 1. -The petitioner has preferred the instant criminal revision against the order dated 19.6.1998 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner under section 341 Cr.P.C. was allowed and the matter was remanded back to the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (West) Jaipur City, Jaipur for passing a fresh order under section 340 Cr.P.C. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and carefully scanned the impugned order as well as the provisions contained under section 340 Cr.P.C. Their Lordships of the Supreme court in Lalit Mohan Mondal & Ors. v. Benovendra Nath Chatterjee, AIR 1982 SC 785 indicated thus:- "Although against an order passed in appeal under section 341 of the Cr.P.C., the order would not be revisable by the High Court under section 397(2). but High Court is entitled to examine the matter under section 482 which expressly overrules the bar contained in Section 41 of the Code. Mere indication by High Court that this is not a fit case for invoking the inherent power under section 482, is not sufficient. The High Court must be itself satisfied whether the order directing complaint to be filed is expedient in the interest of justice, so as to attract its inherent jurisdiction under section 482 of the Code." 3. Sub-section (2) of Section 341 postulates thus:- "(2) An order under this section, and subject to any such order, an order under section 340 shall be final, and shall not he subject to revision." 4. I am therefore of the view that revision against the impugned order is not maintainable. I treat the instant petition as criminal miscellaneous petition under section 482 Cr.P.c. Let it he registered as such and placed before the regular Bench.Orders accordingly. *******