JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has been convicted and sentenced by the trial Court as follows:- Under Section 279 IPC : One month's S.I. and a fine of Rs. 100/- Under Section 337 IPC : One month's S.I. and a fine of Rs. 200/- Under Section 304-A IPC : Six month's S.I. and a fine of Rs. 600/- The conviction and sentence of the petitioner has been upheld by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhilwara. 3. It, is contended by the learned counsel that both the Courts below have committed error in appreciating the evidence on record. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been wrongly denied the benefit of Probation of Offenders Act. 4. I have perused the judgments of both the Courts below. The finding of fact calls for no interference by this Court. I do not consider it a fit case for grant of the benefit under section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However interference is called on the point of sentence. 5. Consequently, the revision application is partly allowed. The conviction of the petitioner for the offence under sections 279, 337 & 304-A IPC is upheld. However, the sentence of imprisonment is reduced to the period already undergone. The petitioner shall be released forthwith if he is not required in any other case. The amount of fine shall, however, remain intact.Revision partly allowed. *******