JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pressed this revision petition only on the ground of sentence. Therefore, this revision is taken up for final hearing today itself. 3. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Chum while upholding the conviction of the petitioner of offence under sections 458 & 324 IPC has reduced the sentence to one year's RI. and to pay the fine of Rs. 100/- and in default of payment to further undergo 15 days imprisonment of offence under section 458 IPC. The sentence of offence under section 324 IPC is reduced to the three months R.I. 4. I have perused the impugned judgment passed by Courts below and have also gone through the record of the case. The finding of fact recorded by the Courts below does not call for any interference. The petitioner has already undergone the sentence of about three months. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case I am of the opinion that the ends of justice would met if the sentence awarded to the accused-petitioner is reduced to the period already undergone by him for the offence under sections 324 & 458 IPC. 5. Consequently, this revision petition is allowed in part. The conviction of the accused-petitioner for the offences under sections 324 Sr 458 IPC is maintained, however, while reducing the sentence for the offences under sections 324 & 458 IPC awarded by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Churu, he is sentenced to the period of sentence already undergone by him for the above offences. The sentence of fine awarded by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge is, however, maintained. The petitioner is given one month's time to deposit the fine. In case, the fine is not deposited, he will undergo the sentence awarded to him in default of payment of fine by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Churu.Let the record of this case be sent back to the learned Court below forthwith.Revision partly allowed. *******