JUDGMENT 1. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and also examined the record. 2. The case as set up by the learned counsel for the appellant is that in view of the dispute pending between the appellant and his brothers as regards the property in question which as per his case is his personal property, his brothers have done unwarranted interference by ascertaining their rights of ownership over the same. 3. From the perusal of the record it is revealed that a partition suit No. 45/96 is also pending between the parties as regard the ancestral property before the Competent Civil Court. The petitioner filed FIR No. 78/97 on 1st May, 1997. After investigating the matter, the police filed F.R/ on 16.9.97 thereby closing further investigations in the matter. Being aggrieved the petitioner moved this court by way of writ petition No. 2660/98 which was disposed of by the learned Single Judge of this Court with the observation "No case is made out for changing the investigating agency. The petitioner has various other remedies. The petitioner should seek other remedies available to him." 4. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has come up in appeal before us which is now being finally disposed of after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Be that as it may, we deem it appropriate to direct that if the petitioner is so advised he may seek alternative remedy of preferring complaint before the concerned trial Magistrate having the competent jurisdiction to deal with and decide the matter and if such complaint is presented before the learned Magistrate within four weeks from today, the same shall be dealt with and decided by the learned Magistrate in accordance with the law. 6. With these observations, the appeal stands disposed of.Appeal Disposed of as Above. *******