JUDGMENT 1. -The learned counsel for the petitioners contended that there is no allegation against the petitioners in the statements of the witnesses about the demand of dowry or money. The petitioners are the brothers of Ram Singh husband of the deceased. The learned counsel drew my attention to the statements of Ashu Singh and Gordhan Singh. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application on the ground that the bail application of the lady accused-Kavita, Rupa and Narbda have been rejected and the case of these petitioners is also on the same footing. However, the learned counsel for the petitioners further argued that the case of the present petitioners is distinguishable because against the other lady accused persons there was a statement that they protested and left the marriage place on account of less dowry; but there is no such statement also against the petitioners. 2. Having considered the arguments and the statements, without expressing any opinion, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioners on bail. 3. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the applicants (I) Kishore Singh, (2) Ganesh and (3) Ghanney Singh all sons of Dhood Singh be released on bail provided each of them executes personal bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) and furnishes one sound and solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.Bail application allowed. *******