JUDGMENT The complainant has filed this revision against order dated 15.1.99 passed by III ASJ Jabalpur during pendency of Cr.A.No. 90/98 granting bail to the accused who is respondent before this Court. The amount of surety bond for his appearance was fixed as Rs. 15,000/-. This is not in dispute by both the parties. It so appears from the record of the appellant Court. The complainant moved an application before the Sessions Court that the amount of surety bond should be enhanced but that was declined by order 15.1.99. This is also the subject matter of the present revision. The accused was convicted for offence u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He was sentenced to R.I. for 6 months and fine of Rs. 1,50,000/-. It is strange that the magistrate passed sentence of so much fine, when the ordinary jurisdiction of the magistrate is limited to impose fine of Rs. 5,000/- u/s 29 CrPC but that of course is not the question involved in this revision. The counsel for the petitioner herein wants the amount of surety bond to be enhanced. After hearing the counsel for the parties this Court finds that it was the discretion of the appellate Court to fix the amount of surety bond for admitting the accused to bail. The complainant cannot be allowed to object to this unless there was misuse of the discretion. This petition, being by the complainant, has no substance and is dismissed.