JUDGMENT 1. - It is true that injunction application filed in suit before the civil court by the petitioner against the enhancement of rate was rejected and the appeal was also dismissed by the appellate court as well as revision by this Court. However, that fact alone would not be sufficient for this Court to entertain this writ petition. During the pendency of suit the petitioner filed revision on refusal of the injunction and, thereafter, the petitioner has withdrawn the suit. 2. The submission made by learned counsel Shri Gehlot was that if this Court will not entertain this revision then the petitioner would be totally remediless. He submitted that as per the observations made by the trial court in the order dated 6.1.87 (Annexure R. 1), he had filed this writ petition and later on withdrawn the suit. 3. It is true that the trial court did make certain observations while refusing the injunction. But that the trial court had never stated that it had no jurisdiction, it has only stated that it would have been proper if the challenge was made before the High Court in writ petition. Such passing observations made by the trial court would not given any right to the petitioner to get any relief from this court in its writ jurisdiction when the petitioner had better alternative remedy by way of civil suit before the civil court and it was already availed of, then this court would not entertain such writ petition as it is purely a contractual matter. Merely because the petitioner failed to obtain any injunction from trial court or from this court in revision and withdrew the suit later on, would not given any right to the petitioner to urged that now this court should entertain this writ petition. On his failure to get injunction from the trial court and later on from the appellate court and then from this court in revision only option to him was to go on with the suit and get it decided at the earliest. 4. In view of the above discussions without going into the merit of this petition, this petition is dismissed only on the ground of better alternative remedy available to the petitioner. Stay order, if any, granted earlier stands vacated.Writ Petition Dismissed Without Giving Into Merits. *******