Honble SHETHNA, J.–There cannot be any better case than this case of gross misuse or abuse of process of law. The petitioner on filing a suit before the S.D.O.Merta appears to have managed to obtain an order (Annex.1) of appointing receiver and issuing notice to the respondents. Under the circumstances, instead of appearing before the S.D.O. Merta in response to the notice the respondents straightway filed appeal before the Revenue Appellate Authority against the order of S.D.O., Merta of appointing receiver. In appeal, the present petitioner raised preliminary objection about its maintainability which was overruled by the appellate authority. Hence, the petitioner approached the Board of Revenue by way of revision No. 11/98. The same was also dismissed by an order at Annex. 4. The petitioner being not satisfied with the same filed this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India against such interlocutory order. (2). The law on this point is very well settled. Against the interlocutory order, ordinarily, this Court would not interfere. The appeal filed by the contesting respondents before the appellate authority is still not decided. It appears that an attempt on the part of the petitioner is to see to it that order of appointing receiver obtained from S.D.O. Merta should continue at any cost. Instead of appearing before the appellate authority and getting the appeal finally decided, the petitioner is unnecessarily approaching the courts after courts and unnecessarily wasted the valuable time of the courts including this Court. It is nothing but a gross abuse of process of law. Merely because there is a remedy of revision or writ petition that does not mean that in every case one can file revision and even writ petition. It is high time that this Court should come down heavily in such type of cases and impose heavy cost, so that in future other may not file such frivolous petitions. (3). In view of the above discussion, this petition is dismissed as it has no merit at all with a special cost of Rs. 10,000/-. The petitioner shall deposit the said cost with the Registrar General of this Court within one month from today. On depositing the same, the same shall be utilised for legal aid purpose. Copy of this order be sent to all the courts below including the S.D.O. Merta, Revenue Appellate Authority, and Board of Revenue, forthwith.