Honble SHETHNA,J.– Mr. Deen Mohammed, who is an Advocate, has filed this petition in person and also addressed the Court in person. He submitted that because of quarrel with the Brahmin Family of Nohar, his name was falsely involved in criminal cases without any proof or justification way back in the year 1950 to 1960 and on the basis of that in the first week of May, 1999, who he was at his village Nohar, the police came for interrogation on the basis that his name was registered in the Register No.10 as a spy of Pakistan. The same has not been pleaded in the petition and in absence of it, it will be difficult for this Court to appreciate this oral contention. (2). The petitioner has averred in this petition that he is 75 years old and per- manent resident of Delhi and since 1963, he is practicing Advocate at Delhi High Court as well as before Honble Supreme Court of India. It is further submitted that neither Delhi Administration nor Delhi Police ever made any such allegations which have been made by the Police of State of Rajasthan, therefore, it was submitted that the entries made against him in the Register No. 10 branding him as spy of Pak- istan for the period from 1950 to 1960 was made maliciously by the local police authorities. The said entry made against him at the Nohar and Bikaner Police Station is still there which may be deleted. (3). Mr. Deen Mohammed, party in person, has submitted that the notice may be issued to the respondents and after calling for the record, the entry made against him in Register No. 10 for the period from 1950 to 1960 be quashed. (4). Apart from the fact that there is a gross delay of almost 40 years in approaching this Court by the petitioner, on peculiar facts of this case. I am not inclined to exercise my extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. (5). Before parting, I must state that in prayer (c), the petitioner has prayed that the Government of Rajasthan be directed to pay Rs. 50 lakhs as compensation and damages for loss of reputation, sufferings and mental torture, agony caused to the petitioner. Such type of relief cannot be granted. (5). Before parting, I must state that in prayer (c), the petitioner has prayed that the Government of Rajasthan be directed to pay Rs. 50 lakhs as compensation and damages for loss of reputation, sufferings and mental torture, agony caused to the petitioner. Such type of relief cannot be granted. If at all, the petitioner is really aggrieved, then he has to approach the proper forum for the same. (6). In view of the above discussion, I do not see any reason to entertain this petition after so many years. Hence dismissed.