(1) MR. Altaf Ahmed, learned Additional Solicitor General, appearing for the C.B.I.. states that the investigation by the C.B.I, will take about four weeks more. (2) THE learned Amiens Curiae states that the reports of the Chairman, Board of Revenue, State of U.P. do not adversely affect any of the parties before us so that copies of these reports need not be disclosed to any one of them. (3) THE report of the. Lokayukt (disclosed in Writ Petition (C) No. 529/98) shall continue to remain under seal. (4) THE learned Amiens Curiae has askedi that Noida should furnish him the following particulars : In regard to the first list given to him by Noida pursuant to the order dated 16th november. 1999, Noida should furnish hi ml with particulars of what the consequence of the show-cause notices referred to therein has been; and in regard to lists 3 and 4 relating to an industrial property and a commercial property, what has happened thereafter. Learned counsel for Noida states that these particulars shall be furnished to the learned Amicus Curiae within two weeks. (5) AT the request of the learned Amicus Curiae, he shaii be assisted by Mr. Nikhil Nayyar and Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Advocates, in these, proceedings and the Registry shall act accordingly. (6) COPIES of the reports of the Chairman, Board of Revenue, State of U. P., shall be made available to the learned counsel for the State.of U. P. I.A. No. 8/99 in W. P. (C) No. 150/97 : (7) IT is for the Union of India and the State of U. P. to decide whether or not the applicant should be promoted. There is no order of this Court which has any application in the matter. (8) I. A. is disposed of accordingly. (9) LIST the matter on 1st September, 2000.