( 1 ) LEARNED counsel for Municipal Corporation of Delhi states that the petitioners are not governed under the Scheme and a mere look at the order dated 20-12-1999 of Mr Chopra at p. 37 shows that the appeals of the petitioners were not maintainable before him because they were not covered by the Scheme. Whatever independent grievance they may have against the respondent authorities can be ventilated in accordance with law before the appropriate court and the earlier order of this Court not allowing such persons to go before any other court to get their grievance redressed will not come in their way. ( 2 ) WITHOUT prejudice to the rights and contentions of both the sides, the status quo order granted by us on 21-1-2000 in this writ petition will continue for two weeks from today. ( 3 ) IT is made clear that this extension of the status quo order is granted only because of our earlier order of 21-1-2000 and will not be treated to be binding on any appropriate court deciding on its own merits the interim or final relief in accordance with law. ( 4 ) THE writ petition is disposed of accordingly. WP (C) No. D 19948 of 1999 ( 5 ) NOTICE to issue returnable on 28-7-2000 at 2. 00 p. m. before this bench. ( 6 ) LEARNED counsel Mr Shiv Kumar appearing with Ms Indra Sawhney accepts notice on behalf of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi and waives service of notice.